Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 523-533, December 2011

Research methods for meta-analyses

  • Nathan Leon Pace, M.D., M.Stat

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 801 581 6393; Fax: +1 801 581 4367.

Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Department of Anesthesiology, 30 North 1900 East, 3C444 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2304, USA

Meta-analysis uses numerical tools to pool data and to estimate a summary effect size for the comparison of two interventions from a set of randomised controlled trials identified in a systematic review. An effect size is a single number that expresses the difference in outcome from the interventions. The most commonly used effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes, for example, mortality, are the odds ratio and the relative risk. The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented in a complex figure, known as a forest plot, which shows both the individual studies and the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses are performed to clarify the effect of the experimental design bias on the effect size. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies are explored by the additional tools of fixed effect versus random effects models and subgroup analyses.

Keywords: epidemiology, effect size, fixed effect, heterogeneity, meta-analysis, random effects, systematic review, variance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6896(11)00064-4

doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.005

Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 523-533, December 2011