Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 487-496, December 2009

How to weigh the current evidence for clinical practice

  • Andrew Padkin, BSc, MSc, MB.ChB, FRCA, MRCP (Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44 1225 825056; Fax: +44 1225 825061.

Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK

This article presents a template for judging trials of tight glucose control in critically ill patients. It reviews threats to both internal validity and generalisability using examples from the current literature. When judging internal validity, it is important to consider factors specific to trials of glucose control (particularly the methods of glucose control, measurement and reporting) in addition to factors common to all randomised controlled trials (such as treatment allocation, losses to follow-up and protocol violations). Judging generalisability requires the identification of differences between the trial population and the population for whom the intervention is being considered. These may relate to the setting, the patients or the practical delivery of tight glucose control or other interventions. Once identified, a judgement must be made for each difference of whether it is likely to modify the effect of tight glucose control.

Keywords: intensive care, insulin, glucose, hyperglycaemia, internal validity, external validity, generalisability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6896(09)00051-2

doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2009.08.007

Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 487-496, December 2009