Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 407-421, September 2008

Central venous catheter-associated infections

  • Walter Zingg, MD (Doctor)

      Affiliations

    • Tel.: +41 22 372 3364; Fax: +41 22 372 3987.
  • Bernhard Walder, MD (Associate Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 22 372 3063; Fax: +41 22 372 7511.

Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Department of Anesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Department of Anesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Most patients in the hospital need vascular access: a peripheral venous line, a short-term non-cuffed central venous catheter (CVC), a long-term cuffed CVC, an implantable port or an arterial line. Such devices, although often indispensable and of benefit, may have the disadvantage of mechanical complications, local exit-site infections or catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CRBSI). Apart from peripheral venous lines, non-cuffed CVCs are the most frequent catheter type in hospitals. The risk for CRBSI of such catheters is high with an incidence density of 2 to 7 episodes per 1000 catheter-days depending on ward-type, institution and geographical region. This review describes the epidemiology, the frequency and the risk of CRBSI among non-cuffed CVCs, provides accepted definitions as well as descriptions of diagnostic techniques and highlights various prevention measures.

Key words: central venous catheters, anesthesia, critical care, infectious diseases, bloodstream infections

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosures: This review was funded with departmental and institutional support.

PII: S1521-6896(08)00051-7

doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2008.05.007

Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 407-421, September 2008