Ethics and law in the intensive care unit

References 

1. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] SLT 317.
2. Extract taken from Mason and McCall Smith Law and Medical Ethics. 5th edn.. Butterworths; 1999;at 551
3. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 211 NY 125 (1914).
4. Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and Others [1985] All ER 643; In Re F (a mental patient: sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC 1; Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789.
5. Reibl v Hughes [1980] 114 DLR (3d) 1.
6. Secretary, Department of Health v JWB and SMB (1992) 66 ALJ 300.
7. Case of Pretty v United Kingdom. (2002) 35 E.H.R.R. 1.
8. Sidaway op. cit., at 666.
9. Re MB (Medical Treatment). [1997] 2 FLR 426, at 436–7.
10. In re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). [1994] 1 WLR 290, at 294; In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). [1993] Fam. 95, at 102.
11. In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op. cit., at 112.
12. In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op. cit., at 113.
13. In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op. cit., at 115.
14. Re MB (Medical Treatment) op. cit.
15. Department of Health. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. March 2001, at p10.
16. Hume D. Of suicide. In:  Singer P editors. Applied Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986;at p. 26
17. Harris J. The Value of Life. London: Routledge; 1985;at p. 68
18. Case of Pretty v United Kingdom. op. cit.
19. Including Dworkin G, Frey RG, Bok S. Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988;McLean S, Britton A. The Case for Physician Assisted Suicide. London: Harper Collins; 1997;Hillyard D, Dombrink J. Dying Right. The Death with Dignity Movement. London: Routledge; 2001;Keown J. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;
20. Harris J. The Value of Life, op.cit., at p.80.
21. Ms B v An NHS Hospital Trust [2002] WL 347038, at 95.
22. For example R v Cox (1992) 12 BMLR 38, Pretty v United Kingdom op.cit.
23. Including the Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon, Northern Territories of Australia.
24. Ms B v An NHS Hospital Trust. op. cit.
25. Kirkham S. British doctors dispatch 25,000 a year, says euthanasia expert. The Sunday Times. (2004) September 19;14:
26. Ward BJ, Tate PA. Attitudes among NHS doctors to requests for Euthanasia. British Medical Journal. 1994;308:1332
27. Including In Re Y. (Mental Patient: Bone Marrow Donation). [1997] Fam. 110.
28. R (on the application of Burke) v General Medical Council [2004] WL 1640202.
29. In re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op. cit.
30. In re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op. cit, at 292.
31. Law Commission . Mental incapacity. Law Commission Report. 1995;231:para 3.2–3.23
32. Re MB op.cit., at 432.
33. In Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation). [1990] 2 AC 1, at 18.
34. In Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation). [1990] 2 AC 1, at 78.
35. Re MB op. cit., at 439.
36. Ms B v An NHS Hospital Trust [2002] WL 347038, at 100.
37. The Lord Chancellor's Department. Making Decisions (Cm 4465) October 1999, at para 1.11.
38. Lord Chancellor's Department. Who Decides? Making Decisions on behalf of mentally incapacitated adults. Consultation paper. From http://www.lcd.gov.uk/family/mdecisions. (Accessed January 2004).
39. Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
40. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1997;155:15
    • MEDLINE
41. Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt (Further Declaration). [2005] EWHC 2293.
42. An NHS Trust Claimant v MB (A child represented by the Children and Family Defendant Court Advisory & Support Service as guardian ad litem). [2006] EWHC 507 (FAM), at 90.
43. Dworkin G. Law and medical experimentation. Monash University Law Review 13:189, at 200.
44. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health et al. 497 US 261 (1990).
45. McLean SAM. Consent and the Law, Consultation Document & Questionnaire, September 1997, at para 5.20.
46. In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) op.cit., at 103.
47. Airedale N.H.S., Trust Respondents v Bland Appellant op.cit., at 872.
48. Airedale N.H.S., Trust Respondents v Bland Appellant op.cit., at 895.
49. Mental Capacity Act 2005, at 9(1).
50. Mental Capacity Act 2005, at 22(3)–22(4).
51. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification. Critical Care Medicine. 1985;10:818
52. Willie Causey, Joe Cloman and Bernice Cloman, Plaintiffs-Appellants v St. Francis Medical Center and Dr Herschel R Harter. Individually and as a Medical Corporation, Defendants-Appellees No. 30, 732–CA Court Of Appeal Of Louisiana Second Circuit 719 So. 2d 1072; 1998 La. App. LEXIS 2477.
53. Ardagh M. Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2000;26:396;at 397
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
54. Savulescu J. Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice. Bioethics. 1998;12:212
    • MEDLINE
55. Shaw AB. In defence of ageism.’. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1994;20:188;at 194
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
56. US President's Commission For the Study of Ethical problems in Medicine and Biomedical Research . Deciding to forgo life-sustaining treatment: a report on the ethical, medical and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington: The Commission; 1983;
57. Harris J. The Value of Life. Routledge; 1985;at 101
58. Harris J. Justice and equal opportunities in health care. Bioethics. 1999;Vol. 13(5):392–404at pp. 392–3
59. Harris J. Justice and equal opportunities in health care. Bioethics. 1999;Vol. 13(5):392–404at 393
60. Harris J. Justice and equal opportunities in health care. Bioethics. 1999;Vol. 13(5):392–404at 404
61. Rescher N. ‘The allocation of exotic medical lifesaving therapy. Ethics. 1969;79:173
62. Menzel PT. Rescuing lives: can't we count?. Hastings Center Report. 1994;24:22
63. British Medical Association . Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment. 2nd edn. BMJ Books; 2001;at p.21
64. Buxton M. Economic appraisal and prescribing choices. Prescribers Journal. 1993;33:133
65. Shaw AB. In defence of ageism. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1994;20:188
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
66. R v Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte B (a minor) (1995) BMLR 1(CA).
67. Airedale N.H.S., Trust Respondents v Bland [1993] AC 789, at 869.
68. British Medical Association. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment. op. cit., at p.20–21.
69. For example see In re C. (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). [1994] 1 WLR 290; In re T. (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). [1993] Fam. 95; Re MB (Medical Treatment). [1997] 2 FLR 426.
70. Unknown author. Wyatt case shows courts need final say. (2004) October 16 BMA news 1.
71. Northridge v Central Sydney Area Health Service [2000] NSW Supreme Court No. SV10583/00.
72. Marchlewski v Hunter Area Health Service (Unreported, NSW Supreme Court, Dowd J, 14 August 1998) NSWSC 771.
73. Northridge v Central Sydney Area Health Service op. cit., at para 114.
74. Northridge v Central Sydney Area Health Service op. cit, at para 125.
75. R (on the application of Burke) v General Medical Council [2004] All ER (D) 588 (Jul) and [2005] EWCA 1003.
76. Airedale N.H.S., Trust Respondents v Bland. Op. cit.
77. An NHS Trust Claimant v MB. [2006] EWHC 507 (FAM).
78. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, et al. End-of-life practices in european intensive care units: the ethicus study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;290:790
79. For example Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland. [1993] A.C. 789.
80. Ms B v An NHS Hospital Trust. [2002] WL 347038.
81. In re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment). [1993] Fam. 95.
82. Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority. [1998] AC 232.