Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 545-563, December 2006

Patients who challenge

  • Michael Ward (Consultant Anaesthetist and Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1865 221587; Fax: +44 1865 220027.

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, UK

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, UK

Programme on Ethics of the New Biosciences, James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford, UK

Individuals have different values. They seek to express their individuality even when receiving medical care. It is a part of modern medical practice and respect for patient autonomy to show respect for different values. We give an account of what it means to respect different values and challenging patients in medical practice. Challenging choices are often choices which are perceived by many to be either irrational or against a person's interests, such as engaging in harmful or excessively risky activities. When the medical profession is involved in such choices, the basic medical principle of acting in a person's best interests is challenged. Often doctors refuse to respect controversial choices on paternalistic grounds. We should all respect and facilitate the controversial choices of competent individuals, subject to resource limitations, our own and others well-being and autonomy, and the public interest. But more importantly, sometimes such choices make for a better, more autonomous life. Sometimes, such choices reflect considerations of global well-being or altruism, or idiosyncratic attitudes to risk. Sometimes, they reflect unusual values. However, in some other cases, controversial choices are irrational and are not expressions of our autonomy. Doctors should assist patients to make rational if individual choices. The patient also bears the responsibility for bringing his beliefs to the attention of the clinician.

Key words: ethics, autonomy, paternalism, refusal of treatment, patient values, patient choice, best interests

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Parts of these arguments appear in Savulescu J., Controversial Choices in Rhodes R, Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Forthcoming 2007.

PII: S1521-6896(06)00053-X

doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2006.09.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 545-563, December 2006